Gambia vs Slovak Republic: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time
- Gambia
- Slovak Republic
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 90.89 % against 90.33 % in Slovak Republic, a difference of 0.56 %.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Gambia ahead.
Gambia ranks 80th and Slovak Republic ranks 81st of 185 countries.
Gambia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Slovak Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 135.58 % | 40.32 % | 95.26 % | Gambia |
| 2000s | 154.13 % | 50.75 % | 103.39 % | Gambia |
| 2010s | 138.37 % | 65.81 % | 72.56 % | Gambia |
| 2020s | 114.01 % | 77.65 % | 36.36 % | Gambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Gambia or Slovak Republic?
- Gambia, at 90.89 % against 90.33 % in Slovak Republic as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Gambia and Slovak Republic?
- 0.56 %, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Slovak Republic?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Gambia and Slovak Republic rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
- Gambia ranks 80th and Slovak Republic ranks 81st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).