Iraq vs Sri Lanka: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time
- Iraq
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Iraq currently reports 142.65 % against 138.54 % in Sri Lanka, a difference of 4.11 %.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iraq ahead.
Iraq ranks 54th and Sri Lanka ranks 57th of 201 countries.
Iraq has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iraq | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 150.14 % | 54.25 % | 95.89 % | Iraq |
| 1970s | 159.74 % | 66.36 % | 93.38 % | Iraq |
| 1980s | 161.95 % | 53.7 % | 108.25 % | Iraq |
| 1990s | 256.4 % | 70.24 % | 186.15 % | Iraq |
| 2000s | 240.56 % | 82.67 % | 157.9 % | Iraq |
| 2010s | 186.45 % | 102.22 % | 84.23 % | Iraq |
| 2020s | 173 % | 104.63 % | 68.38 % | Iraq |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Iraq or Sri Lanka?
- Iraq, at 142.65 % against 138.54 % in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Iraq and Sri Lanka?
- 4.11 %, with Iraq ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Sri Lanka?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Iraq and Sri Lanka rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
- Iraq ranks 54th and Sri Lanka ranks 57th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).