Italy vs Latvia: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time
- Italy
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 44.82 % against 41.89 % in Italy, a difference of 2.93 %.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Italy's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Italy ahead.
Italy ranks 145th and Latvia ranks 143rd of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Italy averaged higher in 3 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Italy | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 37.66 % | 23.43 % | 14.23 % | Italy |
| 2000s | 42.46 % | 35.15 % | 7.32 % | Italy |
| 2010s | 44.89 % | 38.12 % | 6.77 % | Italy |
| 2020s | 42.15 % | 43.77 % | 1.63 % | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Italy or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 44.82 % against 41.89 % in Italy as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Italy and Latvia?
- 2.93 %, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Latvia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Italy and Latvia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
- Italy ranks 145th and Latvia ranks 143rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).