Jamaica vs Mexico: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time
- Jamaica
- Mexico
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 129.89 % against 124.27 % in Mexico, a difference of 5.62 %.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jamaica ahead.
Jamaica ranks 66th and Mexico ranks 68th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 3 and Mexico in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 118.85 % | 138.69 % | 19.84 % | Mexico |
| 1970s | 90.07 % | 119.33 % | 29.26 % | Mexico |
| 1980s | 77.7 % | 112.5 % | 34.79 % | Mexico |
| 1990s | 80.84 % | 117.53 % | 36.7 % | Mexico |
| 2000s | 186.5 % | 111.15 % | 75.35 % | Jamaica |
| 2010s | 132.91 % | 108.97 % | 23.94 % | Jamaica |
| 2020s | 128.94 % | 114.17 % | 14.77 % | Jamaica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Jamaica or Mexico?
- Jamaica, at 129.89 % against 124.27 % in Mexico as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Jamaica and Mexico?
- 5.62 %, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Mexico?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Jamaica and Mexico rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
- Jamaica ranks 66th and Mexico ranks 68th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).