Japan vs Latvia: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency

Japan
45.34 %
in 2023
Latvia
44.82 %
in 2023
Japan rank
142nd
Latvia rank
143rd

Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time

  • Japan
  • Latvia
1020304050196119922023

How they compare

Japan currently reports 45.34 % against 44.82 % in Latvia, a difference of 0.52 %.

The two have swapped places 16 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Japan ahead.

Japan ranks 142nd and Latvia ranks 143rd of 201 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Japan Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 30.34 % 23.43 % 6.91 % Japan
2000s 34.48 % 35.15 % 0.6648 % Latvia
2010s 36.5 % 38.12 % 1.62 % Latvia
2020s 42.46 % 43.77 % 1.31 % Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Japan or Latvia?
Japan, at 45.34 % against 44.82 % in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Japan and Latvia?
0.52 %, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Latvia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Japan and Latvia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
Japan ranks 142nd and Latvia ranks 143rd of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).