Kyrgyzstan vs Nicaragua: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 34.63 % against 34.2 % in Nicaragua, a difference of 0.43 %.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 148th and Nicaragua ranks 149th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 3 and Nicaragua in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 34.92 % | 52.19 % | 17.27 % | Nicaragua |
| 2000s | 52.98 % | 30.36 % | 22.62 % | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 40.49 % | 33.66 % | 6.83 % | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 35 % | 34.67 % | 0.3254 % | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Kyrgyzstan or Nicaragua?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 34.63 % against 34.2 % in Nicaragua as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Kyrgyzstan and Nicaragua?
- 0.43 %, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Nicaragua?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Nicaragua rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 148th and Nicaragua ranks 149th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).