Mauritania vs Norway: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time
- Mauritania
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 28.12 % against 26.16 % in Mauritania, a difference of 1.96 %.
That makes Norway's figure about 1.1 times Mauritania's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.
Mauritania ranks 176th and Norway ranks 173rd of 201 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritania | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 14.91 % | 26.94 % | 12.02 % | Norway |
| 1970s | 12.72 % | 25.38 % | 12.66 % | Norway |
| 1980s | 16.92 % | 26.11 % | 9.19 % | Norway |
| 1990s | 19.62 % | 28.13 % | 8.51 % | Norway |
| 2000s | 17.24 % | 30.28 % | 13.04 % | Norway |
| 2010s | 21.01 % | 32.02 % | 11 % | Norway |
| 2020s | 24.55 % | 34.31 % | 9.76 % | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Mauritania or Norway?
- Norway, at 28.12 % against 26.16 % in Mauritania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Mauritania and Norway?
- 1.96 %, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Norway?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Mauritania and Norway rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
- Mauritania ranks 176th and Norway ranks 173rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).