Mexico vs Senegal: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time
- Mexico
- Senegal
How they compare
Senegal currently reports 130.01 % against 124.27 % in Mexico, a difference of 5.74 %.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Senegal ahead.
Mexico ranks 68th and Senegal ranks 65th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 5 and Senegal in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Senegal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 138.69 % | 141.62 % | 2.92 % | Senegal |
| 1970s | 119.33 % | 82.06 % | 37.27 % | Mexico |
| 1980s | 112.5 % | 107.15 % | 5.34 % | Mexico |
| 1990s | 117.53 % | 106.34 % | 11.2 % | Mexico |
| 2000s | 111.15 % | 95.65 % | 15.5 % | Mexico |
| 2010s | 108.97 % | 99.3 % | 9.66 % | Mexico |
| 2020s | 114.17 % | 134.07 % | 19.9 % | Senegal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Mexico or Senegal?
- Senegal, at 130.01 % against 124.27 % in Mexico as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Mexico and Senegal?
- 5.74 %, with Senegal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Senegal?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Mexico and Senegal rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
- Mexico ranks 68th and Senegal ranks 65th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).