Middle Africa vs United Republic of Tanzania: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency

Middle Africa
242.83 %
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
190.06 %
in 2023
Middle Africa rank
4th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
7th

Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time

  • Middle Africa
  • United Republic of Tanzania
100200300400196119922023

How they compare

Middle Africa currently reports 242.83 % against 190.06 % in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 52.77 %.

That makes Middle Africa's figure about 1.3 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Middle Africa ahead.

Middle Africa ranks 4th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 7th of 18 groups.

Middle Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Middle Africa United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 386.85 % 154.46 % 232.39 % Middle Africa
1970s 304.84 % 166.65 % 138.19 % Middle Africa
1980s 269.98 % 183.96 % 86.02 % Middle Africa
1990s 269.16 % 178.7 % 90.46 % Middle Africa
2000s 235.96 % 201.6 % 34.36 % Middle Africa
2010s 275.28 % 230.29 % 44.99 % Middle Africa
2020s 255.49 % 192.94 % 62.55 % Middle Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Middle Africa or United Republic of Tanzania?
Middle Africa, at 242.83 % against 190.06 % in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Middle Africa and United Republic of Tanzania?
52.77 %, with Middle Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Middle Africa and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Middle Africa and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
Middle Africa ranks 4th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 7th of 18 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Middle Africa vs United Republic of Tanzania: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-potassium-use-efficiency/middle-africa/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-potassium-use-efficiency/middle-africa/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Middle Africa vs United Republic of Tanzania: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).