Nauru vs Serbia: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time
- Nauru
- Serbia
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 86.99 % against 84.94 % in Serbia, a difference of 2.05 %.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Nauru has been ahead every year.
Nauru ranks 93rd and Serbia ranks 95th of 201 countries.
Nauru has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nauru | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 88.44 % | 54.65 % | 33.79 % | Nauru |
| 2010s | 87.25 % | 62.97 % | 24.28 % | Nauru |
| 2020s | 86.67 % | 72.78 % | 13.89 % | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Nauru or Serbia?
- Nauru, at 86.99 % against 84.94 % in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Nauru and Serbia?
- 2.05 %, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Nauru and Serbia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
- Nauru ranks 93rd and Serbia ranks 95th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).