Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs Türkiye: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
102.48 %
in 2023
Türkiye
357.53 %
in 2023
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank
15th
Türkiye rank
14th

Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time

  • Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
  • Türkiye
100200300400196119922023

How they compare

Türkiye currently reports 357.53 % against 102.48 % in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs), a difference of 255.05 %.

That makes Türkiye's figure about 3.5 times Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)'s.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Türkiye has been ahead every year.

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 15th and Türkiye ranks 14th of 32 groups.

Türkiye has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) Türkiye Difference Ahead
1960s 87.65 % 231.58 % 143.93 % Türkiye
1970s 87.08 % 288.06 % 200.98 % Türkiye
1980s 84.29 % 336.07 % 251.79 % Türkiye
1990s 92.24 % 355.55 % 263.31 % Türkiye
2000s 100.51 % 364.72 % 264.2 % Türkiye
2010s 99.13 % 336.12 % 236.99 % Türkiye
2020s 100.45 % 331.87 % 231.42 % Türkiye

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) or Türkiye?
Türkiye, at 357.53 % against 102.48 % in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and Türkiye?
255.05 %, with Türkiye ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and Türkiye?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and Türkiye rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 15th and Türkiye ranks 14th of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs Türkiye: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-potassium-use-efficiency/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/turkiye-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-potassium-use-efficiency/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/turkiye-2/">Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs Türkiye: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).