New Caledonia vs Slovenia: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time
- New Caledonia
- Slovenia
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 16.94 % against 16.87 % in Slovenia, a difference of 0.07 %.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was New Caledonia ahead.
New Caledonia ranks 185th and Slovenia ranks 186th of 201 countries.
New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Caledonia | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 17.26 % | 13.9 % | 3.36 % | New Caledonia |
| 2000s | 16.09 % | 15.82 % | 0.2703 % | New Caledonia |
| 2010s | 18.11 % | 16.84 % | 1.27 % | New Caledonia |
| 2020s | 18.45 % | 18.09 % | 0.3623 % | New Caledonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, New Caledonia or Slovenia?
- New Caledonia, at 16.94 % against 16.87 % in Slovenia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between New Caledonia and Slovenia?
- 0.07 %, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Slovenia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do New Caledonia and Slovenia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
- New Caledonia ranks 185th and Slovenia ranks 186th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).