Nigeria vs Rwanda: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time
- Nigeria
- Rwanda
How they compare
Nigeria currently reports 394.73 % against 358.51 % in Rwanda, a difference of 36.22 %.
That makes Nigeria's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.
Nigeria ranks 10th and Rwanda ranks 13th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Nigeria averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nigeria | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 278.68 % | 865.66 % | 586.98 % | Rwanda |
| 1970s | 256.24 % | 960.12 % | 703.88 % | Rwanda |
| 1980s | 184.58 % | 1,011 % | 826.36 % | Rwanda |
| 1990s | 283.39 % | 886.26 % | 602.87 % | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 366.44 % | 619.52 % | 253.07 % | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 352.73 % | 347.7 % | 5.02 % | Nigeria |
| 2020s | 358 % | 313.48 % | 44.53 % | Nigeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Nigeria or Rwanda?
- Nigeria, at 394.73 % against 358.51 % in Rwanda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Nigeria and Rwanda?
- 36.22 %, with Nigeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nigeria and Rwanda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Nigeria and Rwanda rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
- Nigeria ranks 10th and Rwanda ranks 13th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).