North Macedonia vs Pakistan: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time
- North Macedonia
- Pakistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 57.16 % against 55.5 % in North Macedonia, a difference of 1.66 %.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Pakistan ahead.
North Macedonia ranks 112th and Pakistan ranks 110th of 185 countries.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 29.31 % | 82.82 % | 53.51 % | Pakistan |
| 2000s | 36.65 % | 79.84 % | 43.18 % | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 41.48 % | 65.05 % | 23.57 % | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 53.65 % | 53.7 % | 0.0569 % | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, North Macedonia or Pakistan?
- Pakistan, at 57.16 % against 55.5 % in North Macedonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between North Macedonia and Pakistan?
- 1.66 %, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Pakistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do North Macedonia and Pakistan rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
- North Macedonia ranks 112th and Pakistan ranks 110th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).