North Macedonia vs Puerto Rico: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time
- North Macedonia
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 55.5 % against 53.46 % in Puerto Rico, a difference of 2.04 %.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Puerto Rico ahead.
North Macedonia ranks 112th and Puerto Rico ranks 115th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, North Macedonia averaged higher in 3 and Puerto Rico in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 29.31 % | 28.77 % | 0.5429 % | North Macedonia |
| 2000s | 36.65 % | 35.82 % | 0.8367 % | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 41.48 % | 42.12 % | 0.6409 % | Puerto Rico |
| 2020s | 53.65 % | 48.56 % | 5.09 % | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, North Macedonia or Puerto Rico?
- North Macedonia, at 55.5 % against 53.46 % in Puerto Rico as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between North Macedonia and Puerto Rico?
- 2.04 %, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Puerto Rico?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do North Macedonia and Puerto Rico rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
- North Macedonia ranks 112th and Puerto Rico ranks 115th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).