North Macedonia vs Sudan (former): Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time
- North Macedonia
- Sudan (former)
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 55.5 % against 53.93 % in Sudan (former), a difference of 1.57 %.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Sudan (former) ahead.
North Macedonia ranks 126th and Sudan (former) ranks 128th of 201 countries.
Sudan (former) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Sudan (former) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 29.31 % | 72.01 % | 42.7 % | Sudan (former) |
| 2000s | 36.65 % | 54.16 % | 17.51 % | Sudan (former) |
| 2010s | 41.17 % | 48.16 % | 6.99 % | Sudan (former) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, North Macedonia or Sudan (former)?
- North Macedonia, at 55.5 % against 53.93 % in Sudan (former) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between North Macedonia and Sudan (former)?
- 1.57 %, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Sudan (former)?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2011.
- How do North Macedonia and Sudan (former) rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
- North Macedonia ranks 126th and Sudan (former) ranks 128th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).