Oceania vs United Republic of Tanzania: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency

Oceania
167.96 %
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
190.06 %
in 2023
Oceania rank
7th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
7th

Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time

  • Oceania
  • United Republic of Tanzania
50100150200250196119922023

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 190.06 % against 167.96 % in Oceania, a difference of 22.1 %.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 1.1 times Oceania's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, United Republic of Tanzania has been ahead every year.

Oceania ranks 7th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 7th of 29 groups.

United Republic of Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Oceania United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 64.98 % 154.46 % 89.47 % United Republic of Tanzania
1970s 62.93 % 166.65 % 103.72 % United Republic of Tanzania
1980s 87.32 % 183.96 % 96.64 % United Republic of Tanzania
1990s 96.8 % 178.7 % 81.9 % United Republic of Tanzania
2000s 102.57 % 201.6 % 99.03 % United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 122.24 % 230.29 % 108.05 % United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 135.4 % 192.94 % 57.54 % United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Oceania or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 190.06 % against 167.96 % in Oceania as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Oceania and United Republic of Tanzania?
22.1 %, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Oceania and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
Oceania ranks 7th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 7th of 29 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Oceania vs United Republic of Tanzania: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-potassium-use-efficiency/oceania/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-potassium-use-efficiency/oceania/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Oceania vs United Republic of Tanzania: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).