Portugal vs Yugoslav SFR: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time
- Portugal
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Yugoslav SFR currently reports 29.27 % against 29.09 % in Portugal, a difference of 0.18 %.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Portugal ahead.
Portugal ranks 171st and Yugoslav SFR ranks 170th of 201 countries.
Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Portugal | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 40.08 % | 20.84 % | 19.25 % | Portugal |
| 1970s | 31.56 % | 20.93 % | 10.63 % | Portugal |
| 1980s | 23.25 % | 21.22 % | 2.04 % | Portugal |
| 1990s | 26.39 % | 25.58 % | 0.8134 % | Portugal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Portugal or Yugoslav SFR?
- Yugoslav SFR, at 29.27 % against 29.09 % in Portugal as of 1991.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Portugal and Yugoslav SFR?
- 0.18 %, with Yugoslav SFR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Portugal and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Portugal and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
- Portugal ranks 171st and Yugoslav SFR ranks 170th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).