Slovak Republic vs Suriname: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time
- Slovak Republic
- Suriname
How they compare
Slovak Republic currently reports 90.33 % against 85.9 % in Suriname, a difference of 4.43 %.
That makes Slovak Republic's figure about 1.1 times Suriname's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Suriname ahead.
Slovak Republic ranks 81st and Suriname ranks 83rd of 185 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovak Republic | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 40.32 % | 110.9 % | 70.57 % | Suriname |
| 2000s | 50.75 % | 95.1 % | 44.35 % | Suriname |
| 2010s | 65.81 % | 104.53 % | 38.72 % | Suriname |
| 2020s | 77.65 % | 85.38 % | 7.73 % | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Slovak Republic or Suriname?
- Slovak Republic, at 90.33 % against 85.9 % in Suriname as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Slovak Republic and Suriname?
- 4.43 %, with Slovak Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovak Republic and Suriname?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Slovak Republic and Suriname rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
- Slovak Republic ranks 81st and Suriname ranks 83rd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).