Saint Vincent and the Grenadines vs United Republic of Tanzania: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
522.27 %
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
190.06 %
in 2023
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
6th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
7th

Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency over time

  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
  • United Republic of Tanzania
0100200300400500196119922023

How they compare

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines currently reports 522.27 % against 190.06 % in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 332.21 %.

That makes Saint Vincent and the Grenadines's figure about 2.7 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 6th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 7th of 186 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines averaged higher in 3 and United Republic of Tanzania in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Saint Vincent and the Grenadines United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 113.24 % 154.46 % 41.22 % United Republic of Tanzania
1970s 46.13 % 166.65 % 120.52 % United Republic of Tanzania
1980s 89.05 % 183.96 % 94.91 % United Republic of Tanzania
1990s 69.7 % 178.7 % 108.99 % United Republic of Tanzania
2000s 283.3 % 201.6 % 81.7 % Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
2010s 398.32 % 230.29 % 168.04 % Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
2020s 493.88 % 192.94 % 300.94 % Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines or United Republic of Tanzania?
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, at 522.27 % against 190.06 % in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency between Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and United Republic of Tanzania?
332.21 %, with Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium use efficiency?
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 6th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 7th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines vs United Republic of Tanzania: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-potassium-use-efficiency/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-potassium-use-efficiency/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Saint Vincent and the Grenadines vs United Republic of Tanzania: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium use efficiency
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).