Afghanistan vs Czechia: Nutrient balance β Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance β Cropland potassium over time
- Afghanistan
- Czechia
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 31,955 t against 23,841 t in Czechia, a difference of 8,114 t.
That makes Afghanistan's figure about 1.3 times Czechia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 56th and Czechia ranks 59th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 2 and Czechia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 31,635 t | 95,207 t | 63,572 t | Czechia |
| 2000s | 32,603 t | 56,358 t | 23,755 t | Czechia |
| 2010s | 41,153 t | 38,448 t | 2,705 t | Afghanistan |
| 2020s | 32,615 t | 22,312 t | 10,303 t | Afghanistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance β cropland potassium, Afghanistan or Czechia?
- Afghanistan, at 31,955 t against 23,841 t in Czechia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance β cropland potassium between Afghanistan and Czechia?
- 8,114 t, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Czechia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Afghanistan and Czechia rank globally for nutrient balance β cropland potassium?
- Afghanistan ranks 56th and Czechia ranks 59th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance β Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).