Afghanistan vs Finland: Nutrient balance β Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance β Cropland potassium over time
- Afghanistan
- Finland
How they compare
Finland currently reports 39,515 t against 31,955 t in Afghanistan, a difference of 7,560 t.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.2 times Afghanistan's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Finland ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 56th and Finland ranks 53rd of 201 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 38,612 t | 165,697 t | 127,084 t | Finland |
| 1970s | 34,360 t | 166,374 t | 132,014 t | Finland |
| 1980s | 27,971 t | 152,341 t | 124,370 t | Finland |
| 1990s | 29,690 t | 92,876 t | 63,186 t | Finland |
| 2000s | 32,603 t | 63,434 t | 30,831 t | Finland |
| 2010s | 41,153 t | 45,142 t | 3,988 t | Finland |
| 2020s | 32,615 t | 42,807 t | 10,192 t | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance β cropland potassium, Afghanistan or Finland?
- Finland, at 39,515 t against 31,955 t in Afghanistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance β cropland potassium between Afghanistan and Finland?
- 7,560 t, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Finland?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Afghanistan and Finland rank globally for nutrient balance β cropland potassium?
- Afghanistan ranks 56th and Finland ranks 53rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance β Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).