Angola vs Ethiopia: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Angola
- Ethiopia
How they compare
Angola currently reports -72,884 t against -123,533 t in Ethiopia, a difference of 50,649 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Ethiopia ahead.
Angola ranks 174th and Ethiopia ranks 177th of 186 countries.
Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Ethiopia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -3,826 t | -9,166 t | 5,340 t | Angola |
| 2000s | -25,361 t | -32,240 t | 6,879 t | Angola |
| 2010s | -50,412 t | -89,515 t | 39,103 t | Angola |
| 2020s | -64,153 t | -125,337 t | 61,184 t | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Angola or Ethiopia?
- Angola, at -72,884 t against -123,533 t in Ethiopia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Angola and Ethiopia?
- 50,649 t, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Ethiopia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Angola and Ethiopia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Angola ranks 174th and Ethiopia ranks 177th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).