Angola vs Mexico: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Angola
- Mexico
How they compare
Angola currently reports -72,884 t against -118,116 t in Mexico, a difference of 45,232 t.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Angola ahead.
Angola ranks 184th and Mexico ranks 187th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 6 and Mexico in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -10,938 t | -56,976 t | 46,038 t | Angola |
| 1970s | -6,492 t | -39,985 t | 33,493 t | Angola |
| 1980s | 612.59 t | -39,419 t | 40,032 t | Angola |
| 1990s | -2,627 t | -54,958 t | 52,331 t | Angola |
| 2000s | -25,361 t | -44,927 t | 19,566 t | Angola |
| 2010s | -50,412 t | -43,442 t | 6,971 t | Mexico |
| 2020s | -64,153 t | -73,290 t | 9,137 t | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Angola or Mexico?
- Angola, at -72,884 t against -118,116 t in Mexico as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Angola and Mexico?
- 45,232 t, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Mexico?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Angola and Mexico rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Angola ranks 184th and Mexico ranks 187th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).