Australia vs Türkiye: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Australia
- Türkiye
How they compare
Australia currently reports -262,425 t against -474,457 t in Türkiye, a difference of 212,032 t.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 196th and Türkiye ranks 198th of 201 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Türkiye | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 76,864 t | -108,492 t | 185,355 t | Australia |
| 1970s | 105,828 t | -175,075 t | 280,903 t | Australia |
| 1980s | 45,294 t | -253,018 t | 298,312 t | Australia |
| 1990s | 18,839 t | -322,915 t | 341,754 t | Australia |
| 2000s | 3,551 t | -349,893 t | 353,444 t | Australia |
| 2010s | -70,079 t | -379,680 t | 309,601 t | Australia |
| 2020s | -123,023 t | -431,868 t | 308,846 t | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Australia or Türkiye?
- Australia, at -262,425 t against -474,457 t in Türkiye as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Australia and Türkiye?
- 212,032 t, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Türkiye?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Australia and Türkiye rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Australia ranks 196th and Türkiye ranks 198th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).