Austria vs Kazakhstan: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Austria
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Austria currently reports 70,952 t against 65,582 t in Kazakhstan, a difference of 5,370 t.
That makes Austria's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Austria ranks 38th and Kazakhstan ranks 40th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 3 and Kazakhstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 134,889 t | 180,042 t | 45,154 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 98,808 t | 87,122 t | 11,686 t | Austria |
| 2010s | 83,545 t | 81,241 t | 2,304 t | Austria |
| 2020s | 71,682 t | 48,718 t | 22,964 t | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Austria or Kazakhstan?
- Austria, at 70,952 t against 65,582 t in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Austria and Kazakhstan?
- 5,370 t, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Kazakhstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Austria and Kazakhstan rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Austria ranks 38th and Kazakhstan ranks 40th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).