Azerbaijan vs Papua New Guinea: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Azerbaijan
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports -20,856 t against -27,565 t in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 6,709 t.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Azerbaijan has been ahead every year.
Azerbaijan ranks 156th and Papua New Guinea ranks 160th of 185 countries.
Azerbaijan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -3,337 t | -17,719 t | 14,382 t | Azerbaijan |
| 2000s | -8,327 t | -20,184 t | 11,858 t | Azerbaijan |
| 2010s | -12,119 t | -24,848 t | 12,730 t | Azerbaijan |
| 2020s | -20,799 t | -28,453 t | 7,654 t | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Azerbaijan or Papua New Guinea?
- Azerbaijan, at -20,856 t against -27,565 t in Papua New Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Azerbaijan and Papua New Guinea?
- 6,709 t, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Papua New Guinea?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and Papua New Guinea rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Azerbaijan ranks 156th and Papua New Guinea ranks 160th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).