Bangladesh vs Uzbekistan: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Bangladesh
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 367,627 t against 322,650 t in Bangladesh, a difference of 44,977 t.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.1 times Bangladesh's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 15th and Uzbekistan ranks 12th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 2 and Uzbekistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 102,388 t | 81,948 t | 20,440 t | Bangladesh |
| 2000s | 103,408 t | 79,649 t | 23,760 t | Bangladesh |
| 2010s | 223,677 t | 224,005 t | 328.3 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 290,086 t | 328,790 t | 38,704 t | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Bangladesh or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 367,627 t against 322,650 t in Bangladesh as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Bangladesh and Uzbekistan?
- 44,977 t, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Bangladesh and Uzbekistan rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Bangladesh ranks 15th and Uzbekistan ranks 12th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).