Barbados vs Djibouti: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Barbados
- Djibouti
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 592.23 t against 369.67 t in Djibouti, a difference of 222.56 t.
That makes Barbados's figure about 1.6 times Djibouti's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Djibouti ahead.
Barbados ranks 102nd and Djibouti ranks 104th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 5 and Djibouti in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Djibouti | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 606.37 t | 768.28 t | 161.91 t | Djibouti |
| 1970s | 1,135 t | 874.52 t | 260.16 t | Barbados |
| 1980s | 1,078 t | 448.24 t | 629.85 t | Barbados |
| 1990s | 759.68 t | 480.74 t | 278.94 t | Barbados |
| 2000s | 190.36 t | 543.47 t | 353.11 t | Djibouti |
| 2010s | 500.37 t | 491.72 t | 8.64 t | Barbados |
| 2020s | 569.04 t | 361.83 t | 207.2 t | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Barbados or Djibouti?
- Barbados, at 592.23 t against 369.67 t in Djibouti as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Barbados and Djibouti?
- 222.56 t, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Djibouti?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Barbados and Djibouti rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Barbados ranks 102nd and Djibouti ranks 104th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).