Belarus vs Colombia: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Belarus
- Colombia
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 426,004 t against 351,816 t in Colombia, a difference of 74,188 t.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.2 times Colombia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 10th and Colombia ranks 13th of 201 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Colombia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 460,842 t | 261,935 t | 198,907 t | Belarus |
| 2000s | 426,060 t | 330,391 t | 95,669 t | Belarus |
| 2010s | 465,394 t | 366,669 t | 98,725 t | Belarus |
| 2020s | 423,581 t | 367,830 t | 55,751 t | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Belarus or Colombia?
- Belarus, at 426,004 t against 351,816 t in Colombia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Belarus and Colombia?
- 74,188 t, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Colombia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Colombia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Belarus ranks 10th and Colombia ranks 13th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).