Belarus vs Eastern Europe: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Belarus
- Eastern Europe
How they compare
Eastern Europe currently reports 873,413 t against 426,004 t in Belarus, a difference of 447,409 t.
That makes Eastern Europe's figure about 2.1 times Belarus's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Eastern Europe has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 10th and Eastern Europe ranks 11th of 201 countries.
Eastern Europe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Eastern Europe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 460,842 t | 4.03 million t | 3.57 million t | Eastern Europe |
| 2000s | 426,060 t | 2.12 million t | 1.69 million t | Eastern Europe |
| 2010s | 465,394 t | 1.48 million t | 1.01 million t | Eastern Europe |
| 2020s | 423,581 t | 1.15 million t | 729,120 t | Eastern Europe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Belarus or Eastern Europe?
- Eastern Europe, at 873,413 t against 426,004 t in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Belarus and Eastern Europe?
- 447,409 t, with Eastern Europe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Eastern Europe?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Eastern Europe rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Belarus ranks 10th and Eastern Europe ranks 11th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).