Belarus vs Southern Europe: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Belarus
- Southern Europe
How they compare
Southern Europe currently reports 1.02 million t against 426,004 t in Belarus, a difference of 595,646 t.
That makes Southern Europe's figure about 2.4 times Belarus's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Southern Europe has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 10th and Southern Europe ranks 6th of 185 countries.
Southern Europe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Southern Europe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 460,842 t | 1.45 million t | 992,939 t | Southern Europe |
| 2000s | 426,060 t | 1.26 million t | 832,977 t | Southern Europe |
| 2010s | 465,394 t | 1.04 million t | 570,241 t | Southern Europe |
| 2020s | 423,581 t | 1.02 million t | 599,558 t | Southern Europe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Belarus or Southern Europe?
- Southern Europe, at 1.02 million t against 426,004 t in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Belarus and Southern Europe?
- 595,646 t, with Southern Europe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Southern Europe?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Southern Europe rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Belarus ranks 10th and Southern Europe ranks 6th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).