Belarus vs United Republic of Tanzania: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Belarus
- United Republic of Tanzania
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 426,004 t against -107,590 t in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 533,594 t.
That makes Belarus's figure about 4.0 times United Republic of Tanzania's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 10th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 13th of 186 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | United Republic of Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 460,842 t | -33,476 t | 494,319 t | Belarus |
| 2000s | 426,060 t | -59,734 t | 485,794 t | Belarus |
| 2010s | 465,394 t | -112,630 t | 578,024 t | Belarus |
| 2020s | 423,581 t | -105,540 t | 529,121 t | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Belarus or United Republic of Tanzania?
- Belarus, at 426,004 t against -107,590 t in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Belarus and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 533,594 t, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Belarus ranks 10th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 13th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).