Belgium vs Denmark: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium

Belgium
124,155 t
in 2023
Denmark
125,775 t
in 2023
Belgium rank
32nd
Denmark rank
31st

Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time

  • Belgium
  • Denmark
100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k300.0k350.0k196119922023

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 125,775 t against 124,155 t in Belgium, a difference of 1,620 t.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.

Belgium ranks 32nd and Denmark ranks 31st of 201 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Denmark Difference Ahead
2000s 162,235 t 164,544 t 2,309 t Denmark
2010s 139,668 t 144,141 t 4,473 t Denmark
2020s 132,964 t 138,540 t 5,576 t Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Belgium or Denmark?
Denmark, at 125,775 t against 124,155 t in Belgium as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Belgium and Denmark?
1,620 t, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Denmark?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Belgium and Denmark rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
Belgium ranks 32nd and Denmark ranks 31st of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).