Belgium vs Republic of Korea: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Belgium
- Republic of Korea
How they compare
Republic of Korea currently reports 137,187 t against 124,155 t in Belgium, a difference of 13,032 t.
That makes Republic of Korea's figure about 1.1 times Belgium's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 30th and Republic of Korea ranks 27th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Republic of Korea in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Republic of Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 162,235 t | 150,147 t | 12,087 t | Belgium |
| 2010s | 139,668 t | 149,581 t | 9,913 t | Republic of Korea |
| 2020s | 132,964 t | 141,360 t | 8,397 t | Republic of Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Belgium or Republic of Korea?
- Republic of Korea, at 137,187 t against 124,155 t in Belgium as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Belgium and Republic of Korea?
- 13,032 t, with Republic of Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Republic of Korea?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Republic of Korea rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Belgium ranks 30th and Republic of Korea ranks 27th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).