Belgium vs Southern Asia: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Belgium
- Southern Asia
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 124,155 t against -1.16 million t in Southern Asia, a difference of 1.28 million t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Southern Asia ahead.
Belgium ranks 30th and Southern Asia ranks 36th of 185 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 2 and Southern Asia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Southern Asia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 162,235 t | 861,890 t | 699,655 t | Southern Asia |
| 2010s | 139,668 t | -110,614 t | 250,282 t | Belgium |
| 2020s | 132,964 t | -603,095 t | 736,058 t | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Belgium or Southern Asia?
- Belgium, at 124,155 t against -1.16 million t in Southern Asia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Belgium and Southern Asia?
- 1.28 million t, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Southern Asia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Southern Asia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Belgium ranks 30th and Southern Asia ranks 36th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).