Belize vs Bhutan: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Belize
- Bhutan
How they compare
Belize currently reports 1,418 t against 1,037 t in Bhutan, a difference of 381 t.
That makes Belize's figure about 1.4 times Bhutan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bhutan ahead.
Belize ranks 95th and Bhutan ranks 96th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Belize averaged higher in 1 and Bhutan in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Bhutan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -346.06 t | 799.06 t | 1,145 t | Bhutan |
| 1970s | -881.7 t | 958.17 t | 1,840 t | Bhutan |
| 1980s | -743.82 t | 1,212 t | 1,956 t | Bhutan |
| 1990s | -1,483 t | 646.11 t | 2,129 t | Bhutan |
| 2000s | -5,217 t | 439.55 t | 5,656 t | Bhutan |
| 2010s | -1,447 t | 609.78 t | 2,057 t | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 1,308 t | 1,042 t | 266.1 t | Belize |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Belize or Bhutan?
- Belize, at 1,418 t against 1,037 t in Bhutan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Belize and Bhutan?
- 381 t, with Belize ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Bhutan?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Belize and Bhutan rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Belize ranks 95th and Bhutan ranks 96th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).