Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Latvia: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 22,114 t against 18,513 t in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 3,601 t.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.2 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 59th and Latvia ranks 57th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 31,893 t | 52,307 t | 20,413 t | Latvia |
| 2000s | 34,895 t | 23,170 t | 11,725 t | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 33,319 t | 26,678 t | 6,641 t | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2020s | 20,817 t | 25,834 t | 5,017 t | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 22,114 t against 18,513 t in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Latvia?
- 3,601 t, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Latvia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Latvia rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 59th and Latvia ranks 57th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).