Cambodia vs Puerto Rico: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Cambodia
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Puerto Rico currently reports 2,495 t against 1,735 t in Cambodia, a difference of 760 t.
That makes Puerto Rico's figure about 1.4 times Cambodia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cambodia ahead.
Cambodia ranks 89th and Puerto Rico ranks 87th of 185 countries.
Cambodia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 40,206 t | -2,461 t | 42,667 t | Cambodia |
| 1970s | 40,487 t | 5,934 t | 34,553 t | Cambodia |
| 1980s | 37,260 t | 6,144 t | 31,116 t | Cambodia |
| 1990s | 60,270 t | 5,641 t | 54,629 t | Cambodia |
| 2000s | 57,569 t | 4,242 t | 53,327 t | Cambodia |
| 2010s | 17,039 t | 3,705 t | 13,335 t | Cambodia |
| 2020s | 9,040 t | 2,998 t | 6,042 t | Cambodia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Cambodia or Puerto Rico?
- Puerto Rico, at 2,495 t against 1,735 t in Cambodia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Cambodia and Puerto Rico?
- 760 t, with Puerto Rico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Puerto Rico?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cambodia and Puerto Rico rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Cambodia ranks 89th and Puerto Rico ranks 87th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).