Canada vs Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs): Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium

Canada
250,132 t
in 2023
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
-131,230 t
in 2023
Canada rank
21st
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank
21st

Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time

  • Canada
  • Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
-200.0k0200.0k400.0k196119922023

How they compare

Canada currently reports 250,132 t against -131,230 t in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs), a difference of 381,362 t.

That makes Canada's figure about 1.9 times Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Canada ahead.

Canada ranks 21st and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 21st of 201 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 4 and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) Difference Ahead
1960s 257,162 t 184,781 t 72,381 t Canada
1970s 244,547 t 239,293 t 5,254 t Canada
1980s 234,738 t 365,540 t 130,802 t Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
1990s 99,676 t 205,337 t 105,660 t Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2000s 47,455 t -20,043 t 67,498 t Canada
2010s -79,118 t 51,241 t 130,359 t Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2020s 202,534 t -22,876 t 225,410 t Canada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Canada or Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
Canada, at 250,132 t against -131,230 t in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Canada and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
381,362 t, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Canada and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
Canada ranks 21st and Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 21st of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs): Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-potassium/canada/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-balance-cropland-potassium/canada/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/">Canada vs Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs): Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).