Canada vs Republic of Moldova: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Canada
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Canada currently reports 250,132 t against -6,721 t in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 256,853 t.
That makes Canada's figure about 37.2 times Republic of Moldova's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Canada ahead.
Canada ranks 20th and Republic of Moldova ranks 8th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 3 and Republic of Moldova in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Republic of Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 93,249 t | 26,550 t | 66,699 t | Canada |
| 2000s | 47,455 t | 4,049 t | 43,406 t | Canada |
| 2010s | -79,118 t | -2,198 t | 76,920 t | Republic of Moldova |
| 2020s | 202,534 t | -3,153 t | 205,686 t | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Canada or Republic of Moldova?
- Canada, at 250,132 t against -6,721 t in Republic of Moldova as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Canada and Republic of Moldova?
- 256,853 t, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Republic of Moldova?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Canada and Republic of Moldova rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Canada ranks 20th and Republic of Moldova ranks 8th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).