Central America vs Poland: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Central America
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 327,408 t against 42,522 t in Central America, a difference of 284,886 t.
That makes Poland's figure about 7.7 times Central America's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Central America ranks 17th and Poland ranks 14th of 32 groups.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central America | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -24,951 t | 650,974 t | 675,925 t | Poland |
| 1970s | 3,813 t | 1.30 million t | 1.30 million t | Poland |
| 1980s | 1,955 t | 1.13 million t | 1.13 million t | Poland |
| 1990s | 5,653 t | 417,547 t | 411,894 t | Poland |
| 2000s | 55,471 t | 426,989 t | 371,519 t | Poland |
| 2010s | 97,421 t | 457,491 t | 360,069 t | Poland |
| 2020s | 101,924 t | 398,041 t | 296,117 t | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Central America or Poland?
- Poland, at 327,408 t against 42,522 t in Central America as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Central America and Poland?
- 284,886 t, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central America and Poland?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Central America and Poland rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Central America ranks 17th and Poland ranks 14th of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).