Central Asia vs Uzbekistan: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Central Asia
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Central Asia currently reports 630,962 t against 367,627 t in Uzbekistan, a difference of 263,335 t.
That makes Central Asia's figure about 1.7 times Uzbekistan's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Central Asia has been ahead every year.
Central Asia ranks 13th and Uzbekistan ranks 12th of 29 groups.
Central Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Asia | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 340,625 t | 81,948 t | 258,677 t | Central Asia |
| 2000s | 272,757 t | 79,649 t | 193,109 t | Central Asia |
| 2010s | 465,282 t | 224,005 t | 241,277 t | Central Asia |
| 2020s | 563,377 t | 328,790 t | 234,586 t | Central Asia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Central Asia or Uzbekistan?
- Central Asia, at 630,962 t against 367,627 t in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Central Asia and Uzbekistan?
- 263,335 t, with Central Asia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Central Asia and Uzbekistan rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Central Asia ranks 13th and Uzbekistan ranks 12th of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).