Central Asia vs Yugoslav SFR: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Central Asia
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Central Asia currently reports 630,962 t against 369,950 t in Yugoslav SFR, a difference of 261,012 t.
That makes Central Asia's figure about 1.7 times Yugoslav SFR's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Yugoslav SFR ahead.
Central Asia ranks 14th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 11th of 32 groups.
Across the 4 decades both report, Central Asia averaged higher in 1 and Yugoslav SFR in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Asia | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 358,787 t | 394,522 t | 35,736 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1970s | 388,011 t | 463,270 t | 75,259 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1980s | 483,782 t | 517,991 t | 34,210 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1990s | 462,998 t | 408,296 t | 54,702 t | Central Asia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Central Asia or Yugoslav SFR?
- Central Asia, at 630,962 t against 369,950 t in Yugoslav SFR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Central Asia and Yugoslav SFR?
- 261,012 t, with Central Asia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Central Asia and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Central Asia ranks 14th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 11th of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).