Chad vs Costa Rica: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Chad
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 49,144 t against 47,914 t in Chad, a difference of 1,230 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Chad ranks 48th and Costa Rica ranks 47th of 201 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -2,063 t | 5,680 t | 7,742 t | Costa Rica |
| 1970s | -1,530 t | 12,423 t | 13,953 t | Costa Rica |
| 1980s | 204.67 t | 15,032 t | 14,827 t | Costa Rica |
| 1990s | 1,685 t | 25,659 t | 23,974 t | Costa Rica |
| 2000s | 8,798 t | 47,149 t | 38,351 t | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 17,199 t | 40,245 t | 23,047 t | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 38,620 t | 48,741 t | 10,121 t | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Chad or Costa Rica?
- Costa Rica, at 49,144 t against 47,914 t in Chad as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Chad and Costa Rica?
- 1,230 t, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Costa Rica?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Chad and Costa Rica rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Chad ranks 48th and Costa Rica ranks 47th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).