Chile vs Finland: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Chile
- Finland
How they compare
Finland currently reports 39,515 t against 25,880 t in Chile, a difference of 13,635 t.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.5 times Chile's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 54th and Finland ranks 51st of 186 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 9,085 t | 165,697 t | 156,612 t | Finland |
| 1970s | 13,236 t | 166,374 t | 153,138 t | Finland |
| 1980s | 5,840 t | 152,341 t | 146,501 t | Finland |
| 1990s | 34,003 t | 92,876 t | 58,874 t | Finland |
| 2000s | 21,573 t | 63,434 t | 41,862 t | Finland |
| 2010s | 7,853 t | 45,142 t | 37,288 t | Finland |
| 2020s | 21,418 t | 42,807 t | 21,389 t | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Chile or Finland?
- Finland, at 39,515 t against 25,880 t in Chile as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Chile and Finland?
- 13,635 t, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Finland?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Chile and Finland rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Chile ranks 54th and Finland ranks 51st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).