Chile vs Lithuania: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Chile
- Lithuania
How they compare
Chile currently reports 25,880 t against 25,483 t in Lithuania, a difference of 397 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lithuania ahead.
Chile ranks 57th and Lithuania ranks 58th of 201 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 38,967 t | 73,974 t | 35,007 t | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 21,573 t | 52,633 t | 31,060 t | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 7,853 t | 43,026 t | 35,173 t | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 21,418 t | 29,693 t | 8,275 t | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Chile or Lithuania?
- Chile, at 25,880 t against 25,483 t in Lithuania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Chile and Lithuania?
- 397 t, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Lithuania?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Chile and Lithuania rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Chile ranks 57th and Lithuania ranks 58th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).