Colombia vs Poland: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Colombia
- Poland
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 351,816 t against 327,408 t in Poland, a difference of 24,408 t.
That makes Colombia's figure about 1.1 times Poland's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Poland ahead.
Colombia ranks 13th and Poland ranks 14th of 201 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 82,882 t | 650,974 t | 568,092 t | Poland |
| 1970s | 83,514 t | 1.30 million t | 1.22 million t | Poland |
| 1980s | 134,665 t | 1.13 million t | 997,405 t | Poland |
| 1990s | 257,812 t | 417,547 t | 159,734 t | Poland |
| 2000s | 330,391 t | 426,989 t | 96,598 t | Poland |
| 2010s | 366,669 t | 457,491 t | 90,822 t | Poland |
| 2020s | 367,830 t | 398,041 t | 30,210 t | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Colombia or Poland?
- Colombia, at 351,816 t against 327,408 t in Poland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Colombia and Poland?
- 24,408 t, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Poland?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Colombia and Poland rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Colombia ranks 13th and Poland ranks 14th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).