Cook Islands vs Sudan: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Cook Islands
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 86.21 t against 34.66 t in Cook Islands, a difference of 51.55 t.
That makes Sudan's figure about 2.5 times Cook Islands's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.
Cook Islands ranks 116th and Sudan ranks 113th of 201 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Cook Islands averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cook Islands | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 81.53 t | 783.24 t | 701.71 t | Sudan |
| 2020s | 43.48 t | -14,053 t | 14,096 t | Cook Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Cook Islands or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 86.21 t against 34.66 t in Cook Islands as of 2023.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Cook Islands and Sudan?
- 51.55 t, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cook Islands and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Cook Islands and Sudan rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Cook Islands ranks 116th and Sudan ranks 113th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).