Czechoslovakia vs Middle Africa: Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium
Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium over time
- Czechoslovakia
- Middle Africa
How they compare
Czechoslovakia currently reports 194,950 t against -341,623 t in Middle Africa, a difference of 536,573 t.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Czechoslovakia has been ahead every year.
Czechoslovakia ranks 26th and Middle Africa ranks 26th of 201 countries.
Czechoslovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechoslovakia | Middle Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 529,931 t | -102,934 t | 632,865 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1970s | 778,190 t | -109,979 t | 888,169 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1980s | 724,973 t | -119,383 t | 844,356 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1990s | 327,027 t | -144,218 t | 471,245 t | Czechoslovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient balance — cropland potassium, Czechoslovakia or Middle Africa?
- Czechoslovakia, at 194,950 t against -341,623 t in Middle Africa as of 1992.
- What is the difference in nutrient balance — cropland potassium between Czechoslovakia and Middle Africa?
- 536,573 t, with Czechoslovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechoslovakia and Middle Africa?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Czechoslovakia and Middle Africa rank globally for nutrient balance — cropland potassium?
- Czechoslovakia ranks 26th and Middle Africa ranks 26th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Nutrient balance — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).